New York Supreme Court, 1827

Irwin v. Deyo

Irwin v. Deyo
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1827
7 Cow. 153

Counsel

J. Cole, for the motion., J. Sudam, contra.

Irwin v. Deyo

Opinion of the Court

Curia.

Giles v. Caines, 3 Caines, 107, gives countenance to the practice on the part of the defendant. But the rule supposed to be implied by that case, was exploded by Smith v. Wells, (6 John 286.) The party must be governed by the copies delivered. If the other party desire the pleading should be filed, we will compel this to be done at any time nunc pro tunc. The motion must be granted.

Motion granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.