New York Supreme Court, 1827

Winchell v. Latham

Winchell v. Latham
New York Supreme Court · Decided August 15, 1827
7 Cow. 367

Counsel

G. C. Bronson, for the plaintiff., H. R. Storrs, for the defendant.

Winchell v. Latham

Opinion of the Court

On a motion for a re-taxation of costs: The conit de°*ded ^at lowing items were allowable to the plaintiff, on a verdict recovered against the defendant:

Counsel for perusing and amending declaration; and-three copies of the declaration.

But they disallowed the following:

Braft and engrossing H. P. record, with pleadings, &c., because this had been paid for by the defendant at a previous circuit, on putting off the trial; and a testatum execution, on the ground that the defendant, both when the ' ° 1 action was commenced, and when the costs were taxed, ™ ^ county of Oneida, where the venue was laid.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.