New York Supreme Court, 1827

Schermerhorn v. Van Valkenburgh

Schermerhorn v. Van Valkenburgh
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1827
7 Cow. 519

Counsel

J. Koon, for the defendant,, A. Vanderpoel, contra.

Schermerhorn v. Van Valkenburgh

Opinion of the Court

Curia.

The order to stay proceedings on the part of the plaintiff would not, per se, suspend the running of the rule to rejoin; the time allowed by which expired with the 15th of August. The order to stay, therefore, having ceased to operate before the 20th, the default of that'day was regular. And we can only interfere and set it aside on terms, which are payment of the costs.

Rule accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.