New York Supreme Court, 1828

M'Kenster v. Van Zandt

M'Kenster v. Van Zandt
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1828
1 Wend. 13

Counsel

JD. Burwell, for defendant., J. T. B. Van Vechten, for plaintiff

M'Kenster v. Van Zandt

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The process was void, and must be set aside with costs. The notice of motion signed D. B. attorney for defendant, was a sufficient notice of retainer. (3 Caines, 133.) After the appearance of the defendant, the rule for discontinuance, without the payment of the defendant’s costs, was a nullity. (10 Johns. R. 367.) The motion is granted on the defendant’s stipulating not to bring an action of false imprisonment.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.