Plumb v. Lyman
Plumb v. Lyman
1 Wend. 74
Opinion of the Court
By the Coiirt,
The plaintiff being entitled only to'common pleas costs, has no right to tax the defendant with supreme court costs in consequence of a case made, or other incidental services in the progress of the suit. The same rate of charging must be preserved throughout. The costs having been taxed on á defective notice, a retaxation is ordered at the expense of the plaintiff, and the motion is granted, with cbsts.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.