New York Supreme Court, 1828

People v. Onondaga Common Pleas

People v. Onondaga Common Pleas
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1828 · Sutherland
1 Wend. 314

Counsel

B. Davis Jfoxon, for relator.

People v. Onondaga Common Pleas

Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The submission of all suits and controversies to arbitration, is a discontinuance of a suit depending in court, where there is no provision made for its continuance by authorizing a rule for judgment on the award, (6 Cowen, 399 ; 18 Johns. R, 22;) bat the party who might have insisted on the discontinuance, was competent to waive it; and, in this case, it was waived by the defendant’s counsel appearing at the trial, cross-examining the plaintiff’s witnesses, and addressing the jury. As to the terms imposed, upon granting a new trial, those rested in the discretion of the common pleas, with the exercise of which this court never interferes. Motion denied, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.