New York Supreme Court, 1829

Wilson v. Tiffany

Wilson v. Tiffany
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1829
3 Wend. 310
Wilson v. Tiffany

Opinion of the Court

Service of papers on motions. In this case, notice of a mofjon for a commission to examine witnesses was given, . , _ . , , , r From the jurat to the affidavits produced to the court, it apPeared that it was sworn to subsequent to the time of service of what purported to be a copy on the opposite party. This wag 0¡3jecte¿t0 as irregular, and so held by the court, who said that though, under the circumstances of this case, they *311would grant thé motions such objection, in any case subsequently arising, would be sustained.*

Hatch Cambreling, for the motion.

J. R. Van Duzer, contra.

A case subsequently came before the court, in which the same question arose, and they refused to entertain the motion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.