New York Supreme Court, 1830

Bibbins v. Noxon

Bibbins v. Noxon
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1830 · Sutherland
4 Wend. 207

Counsel

E. W. Leavenworth, for defendant, Baldwin <§• Strong, for plaintiff.

Bibbins v. Noxon

Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The variance is fatal, the defendant having put the judgment in issue by his plea of nul tiel record. Had the judgment been mere matter of inducement, the variance might have been disregarded ; but in this case it cannot be overlooked. It cannot be cured by a remititur; for that must be before judgment. (Strange, 1170. 4 T. R. 560.) The defendant is entitled to judgment.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.