New York Supreme Court, 1831

Kesler v. Haynes

Kesler v. Haynes
New York Supreme Court · Decided August 4, 1831 · Savage
6 Wend. 547

Counsel

/. Williams, for defendants,, M. T. Reynolds, for plaintiff.

Kesler v. Haynes

Opinion of the Court

By the Court

Savage, Ch. J.

It was the duty of the clerk to have entered the appearance of the defendants on the writ being returned. 2 R. S. 528, § 34. The defendants cannot avail themselves of his omission ; nor can they object that the sheriff accepted a bond with but one surety. The statute, 2 R. S. 523, § 7, requires a bond with sufficient sureties to be approved by the sheriff, to be executed before the service of a writ of replevin. If he omits to" take" sufficient surety, he is responsible, but the proceedings are not irregular.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.