New York Supreme Court, 1833

Ex parte Green v. Oneida Common Pleas

Ex parte Green v. Oneida Common Pleas
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 15, 1833 · Savage
10 Wend. 592
Ex parte Green v. Oneida Common Pleas

Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The common pleas did right in setting aside the proceedings. Where a suit is commenced in the common pleas of one county, the declaration cannot be served in another county. The provision in the statute that the service of a declaration may be by a sheriff, and that he may be ruled to return it, Laws of 1833, p. 394, § 2, implies ¡that the service is to be in the county in the court of which *593the declaration is filed. A declaration in a suit .commenced by declaration is analogous to process, and process in a suit commenced in the common pleas of one county cannot be served in another. It would not be the regular and orderly conduct of a suit to file a bill against an officer of a court in one county, and serve him with a copy of such bill in another, and upon the same principle the service of the copy of the declaration in this case was irregular.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.