Lockwood v. McLean
Lockwood v. McLean
18 Wend. 344
Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
This case is distinguishable from Talman v. Barnes, (12 Wendell, 227,) where an admission of due service was held sufficient, though it was shown that short notice was given. The admission there was by. the attorney; here it is by the agent, who had no power to dispense with the full notice. The motion is denied with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.