New York Supreme Court, 1838

Duncan v. Ray

New York Supreme Court · Decided July 15, 1838 · Nelson

19 Wend. 530

Counsel

A. G. Rogers, for the plaintiff in error., W. P. Hawes, for the defendant in error.

Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Nelson, Ch. J.

The objection of variance between the bill of particulars and the evidence of sale was properly disregarded, as is manifest from the following cases : 2 Taunt. 224; 1 Campb. 69, n.; 3 Maule & Selw. 380; 3' Bing. 3 ; 3 Wendell, 344; 4 id. 360.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.