New York Supreme Court, 1840

Walker v. Holmes & Launitz

Walker v. Holmes & Launitz
New York Supreme Court · Decided June 15, 1840 · Bronson
22 Wend. 614

Counsel

W. W. Frothingham, for the defendants., C. McVean, for the plaintiff.

Walker v. Holmes & Launitz

Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

The practice on requiring

security for costs has been regulated by statute, and it is enough that the plaintiff has complied with the statute by executing a bond with a sufficient surety, and the surety has justified. See Barnett v. Pardow, 10 Wendell, 615.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.