New York Supreme Court, 1842

Francis & Eames v. Sitts

Francis & Eames v. Sitts
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 15, 1842 · Cowen
2 Hill & Den. 362

Counsel

J. Benedict, for the defendant,, W. McCall, contra,

Francis & Eames v. Sitts

Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Cowen, J.

The admission of service goes only to the mode; and ought not to avail as a waiver of irregularity in the time of declaring.

But the answer derived from the notice of retainer is conclusive. Such a notice has, by rule 26, the effect of an appearance the same as if the defendant had actually entered an appearance with the clerk. This may be done as well before, as after the return day of the writ

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.