New York Supreme Court, 1842

Beadle v. Chenango County Mutual Insurance

Beadle v. Chenango County Mutual Insurance
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 15, 1842
3 Hill & Den. 161

Counsel

B. D. Noxon,, JY. Hill, Jun. for the defendants.

Beadle v. Chenango County Mutual Insurance

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The parties may insert what conditions they please in a policy, provided there be nothing in them contrary to the criminal law, or public policy. This is constantly done in marine policies, and the principle which upholds it there extends to all other policies. The Matter of the Long Island Rail Road Company, (19 Wendell, 37,) has no application. The terms of forfeiture were there imposed by the company. Here the condition was inserted by mutual consent.

Judgment for the defendants.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.