New York Supreme Court · Decided July 15, 1842 · Cowen
3 Hill & Den. 236
Counsel
R. R. Menzie, for the plaintiff in error,, A. §• A. J. Parker, for the defendant in error.
M'Minn v. Richtmyer
Opinion of the Court
By the Court Cowen, J.
*237Judgment affirmed.
*236The fact that the note was left with Daniel for collection, was, I think, enough to warrant the justice in coming to the conclusion that he had authority to appear as attorney for Richtmyer. A general authority to col*237lect, implies a power so to appear ; and the fact that Daniel had the note in his custody, was a circumstance tending further to show the power.