New York Supreme Court, 1842

Delafield v. Sandford

Delafield v. Sandford
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 15, 1842 · Cowen
3 Hill & Den. 473

Counsel

J. Edwards, for the plaintiff,, A. Gibbs, contra.

Delafield v. Sandford

Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Cowen, J.

This motion would have been well founded had it been made before the revised statutes ; but now a writ of error and order obtained at any time stays proceedings even after levy. (2 R. S. 494, 5, 2d. ed. § 29, 30.) The provision in the last section is, that if an execution shall have been issued and not fully executed, the service of the order shall stay, &c. It is supposed that the levy is a full execution within the meaning of the statute. Not so. To complete the execution, there must be a sale at least. There is no cause, therefore, either for setting aside the order or directing the sheriff to proceed.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.