New York Supreme Court, 1844

Hall v. Fowler

Hall v. Fowler
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 15, 1844 · Nelson
6 Hill & Den. 630

Counsel

S Chapman, for the plaintiff. ., B. F. Chapman, for the defendant.

Hall v. Fowler

Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Nelson, Ch. J.

The plea is no answer to the action so far as respects Steadman, although a surety, and is therefore bad. (Browne v. Carr and others, 2 Russell’s Rep. 600, 7 Bing. 508, S. C. ; Langdale v. Parry, 2 Dowl. & Ryl. 337.)

Even special bail are not discharged by the certificate of the principal, after they have become .fixed. (Woolley v. Cobbe, 1 Burr. 244; Mannin v. Partridge, 14 East, 598; Theob. Pr. & Bur. 207; Eden On Bankr. 415.) Before they become fixed, however, as their only obligation is to produce the body of the principal on the ca. sa., and as that is released from arrest by force of the discharge, they may be relieved.

*631As bail in error cannot surrender their principal, they remain liable, though the principal become a bankrupt, and obtain his certificate pending the writ. (Southcote v. Braithwaite, 1 T. R. 624 ; Eden On Bankr. 415.)

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.