New York Supreme Court, 1844

Gott v. Owen

Gott v. Owen
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 15, 1844 · Bronson
7 Hill & Den. 155

Counsel

A. Taber, for the plaintiff, moved for a reference., R. J. Hilton, contra, said the notice was insufficient.

Gott v. Owen

Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

This is a motion to refer to a sole referee, which can only be ordered with the consent of parties. (Stat. of 1836, p. 767.) The plaintiff should have moved to refer to three persons—naming them in the notice. (2 R. S. 384, §§ 39, 40; Bedle v. Willett, 1 Caines, 7; Lusher v. Walton, id. 150.) It is still the practice to name three referees in the notice, though on making the motion, unless the parties are agreed, each names one referee, and the court designates the third.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.