New York Supreme Court, 1844

Espino v. Nash & Manchester

Espino v. Nash & Manchester
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 15, 1844 · Bronson
7 Hill & Den. 167

Counsel

N.Hill, Jr., on behalf of Manchester,, J), Greig, for the plaintiff.

Espino v. Nash & Manchester

Opinion of the Court

*168 By the Court,

Bronson, J.

As a default for not joining in demurrer had not been entered, the plaintiff had a clear right to amend as against the defendant Nash; and as he could not exercise that right without affecting both of the defendants, I think Manchester as well as Nash must answer the amended declaration. (Thomas v. Allen, 2 Wend. 618.)

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.