New York Supreme Court, 1844

Sponable v. Snyder

Sponable v. Snyder
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 15, 1844 · Bockee, Johnson, Lott, Porter
7 Hill & Den. 427

Counsel

S. Stevens óf D. Cady, for the plaintiff in error, and, N. Hill Jun., for the defendant in error.

Sponable v. Snyder

Opinion of the Court

The only question raised by the plaintiff in error and discussed here was, whether notice to the husband of Mrs. Snyder, of the prior unregistered mortgage to Rice, was equivalent to notice to her.

Senators Bockee, Johnson, Lott and Porter

delivered opinions, concurring in substance with the view taken of the question by Mr. Justice Bronson, who delivered the opinion of the supreme court. And .

On the question being put, “Shall this judgment be reversed?” all the members of the court present who heard the argument, seventeen in number, voted for affirmance.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.