New York Supreme Court, 1844

Riley v. Van Amrange

Riley v. Van Amrange
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 15, 1844
1 How. Pr. 41

Counsel

E. Townsend, Lefts Counsel. Emery Townsend, Lefts Atty., R. L. Joice, Plffs Counsel. Peter Wilson, Plffs Atty.

Riley v. Van Amrange

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff ought to have noticed the pleas as frivolous. The judge also made a similar remark, as in the case of Barker vs. McBride, and hoped counsel would understand that it would be necessary to be ready at the commencement of the term, when the court was held at Rochester.

Lecision.—Motion granted on payment of costs of default, and subsequent proceedings and costs of opposing motion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.