New York Supreme Court, 1844

Wharton v. Barry

Wharton v. Barry
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 15, 1844
1 How. Pr. 60

Counsel

R. J. Hilton, Defts Counsel. A* Becker, Defts Atty., J. Davis, Plffs Counsel. O. H. Chittenden, Plffs Atty

Wharton v. Barry

Opinion of the Court

*61Denied with costs, on a defective affidavit of merits. That part of the affidavit is as follows: the defendant has a good substantial defence therein upon the merits, as he is advised by the counsel above named, and verily believed to be true.” The word believed should be believes. Plaintiff’s counsel alleged the same point had before been decided by Judge Cowen.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.