New York Supreme Court, 1845

Wilder v. Wheeler

Wilder v. Wheeler
New York Supreme Court · Decided March 15, 1845 · Beardsley
1 How. Pr. 114

Counsel

S. Stevens, Befts Counsel. C. D. Sheldon, Befts Mty., E. Pearson, Plffs Counsel. Pearson & Church, Plffs Attys.

Wilder v. Wheeler

Opinion of the Court

Beardsley, Justice.

Held that under the 39th rule, both orders were a nullity. The recorder had no power to make an order for that.purpose within four days; and after the four days had expired, the circuit judge had no power to grant a similar order; but allowed the service of defendant’s papers for the motion to set aside the report to be deemed good service, on payment of $7 costs of opposing this motion in twenty days» and that plaintiffs have twenty days thereafter to serve counter affidavits_ Judgment to stand as security.

Rule accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.