New York Supreme Court, 1845

Welling v. Sweet

Welling v. Sweet
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 15, 1845 · Bronson
1 How. Pr. 156

Counsel

H. C. Van Vorst, Defts Counsel. Alex’r S. Rowley, Defts Atty., C. M. Jenkins, Plffs Counsel. I. W. Fairfield, Plffs Attys.

Welling v. Sweet

Opinion of the Court

Bronson, Chief Justice.

Denied the motion on the ground that no reason was shown by the papers, why all the defendants did not join in the motion. By the practice of this court, a motion to change the venue can only be made by all the defendants, unless a good reason is shown for their not joining in the motion—such as one of them has suffered a default, &c.

Decision.—Motion denied with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.