Wagner v. Adams

H. Adams for defendant, persisted that the statute on this subject should be construed as requiring the plaintiff himself to execute the bond *192with one or more sureties. J. Newland for plaintiff, cited 2 R. S., 575, § 4; 4 Paige, 273, showing that the plaintiff need not join in the bond*

It is not necessary that the plaintiff should himself execute the bond, when he does not, two sufficient sureties must do so.

The motion was disposed of on other points.