Anderson v. Vandenburgh
Anderson v. Vandenburgh
1 How. Pr. 212
Opinion of the Court
Denied the motion with costs on the ground that Clark & Pattison attended the term in good faith, with an intention to oppose the motion as they were bound to do by the notice served on them, and in consequence of the omission of plaintiff’s attorneys in addressing their original papers to Clark & Pattison, they had good reason to suppose there might be two causes between the same parties, and took a rule for costs regularly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.