New York Supreme Court, 1845

Pease v. Blossom

Pease v. Blossom
New York Supreme Court · Decided September 15, 1845 · Beardsley
1 How. Pr. 222

Counsel

O. F. Thompson, Defts Counsel. J. W. & O. F. Thompson, Defts Attys., R. H. Shannon, Plffs Counsel. R. H. Shannon, Plffs Atty.

Pease v. Blossom

Opinion of the Court

Beardsley, Justice.

Thought the motion should be granted. The cause of action arose in Washington county, and the defendants allege a failure of part of the consideration of the note, and state that their witnesses will be necessary to prove that. I am unable to see the materiality of the witnesses on the part of the plaintiff, residing in New York and Kings; the note was given in Washington county and it appears that the proof required, will be in Washington county.

Motion granted, and cause referred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.