Arnold v. Thomas
Arnold v. Thomas
1 How. Pr. 246
Opinion of the Court
R was insisted by defendant, that the affidavit was insufficient, for the reason that the facts stated in it, did not show a conversion; the defendant might have hired the property from plaintiff.
Held the affidavit insufficient, for the reason mentioned, and decided that no order was necessary; that plaintiff could hold to bail of course, and defendant must apply to mitigate the amount or discharge on common bail. Order to hold bail vacated, without costs
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.