New York Supreme Court, 1845

Kingston Bank v. Roosa

Kingston Bank v. Roosa
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 15, 1845 · Jewett
2 How. Pr. 8

Counsel

J. 0. Forsyth, plaintiffs1 counsel., H. M. RomeyH, plaintiffs' attorney., E. Sanford, defendants counsel., E. Whitaker, defendants attorney.

Kingston Bank v. Roosa

Opinion of the Court

Jewett, Justice.

Thought the authority of Sehoonmaker should be considered sufficient to receive the costs and stipulation as the agent of Pitcher. Sehoonmaker undoubtedly thought he had authority, and acted in good faith, and there was something due to the honor of the profession in such cases.

Motion granted without costs, plaintiffs’ attorney to stipulate and pay costs of last motion in twenty days.

Another cause between the same parties, upon the same state of facts, decided the same.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.