New York Supreme Court, 1845

Stacy v. Farnham

Stacy v. Farnham
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 15, 1845 · Jewett
2 How. Pr. 26

Counsel

Geo. W. Houghton, defendant's counsel and attorney., Geo. L. Marvin, plaintiff's counsel and attorney.

Stacy v. Farnham

Opinion of the Court

Jewett, Justice.

This suit is neither brought by or against the sheriff of Brie, (2 R. S. 533, *§ 67,) therefore the writ of replevin was properly ^directed to and executed by him. The affidavit of ownership of property, &c., annexed to the writ should not have been entitled; for the reason it is informal and defective, but it maybe amended. (Cutler agt. Bathbone, sheriff, 1 Hill, 204, and cases there cited.) The plaintiff may, therefore, amend the defect in the affidavit by making and filing a new affidavit annexed to the writ without costs. {Rule 61.)

Buie accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.