New York Supreme Court, 1846

Follet v. Sherman

Follet v. Sherman
New York Supreme Court · Decided September 15, 1846 · Bronson
2 How. Pr. 238

Counsel

A. Taber, plaintiffs' counsel., R. Proudfit, Jr., plaintiffs' attorney., M. TAGGART, defendants counsel and attorney.

Follet v. Sherman

Opinion of the Court

Bronson, Chief Justice.

The surrejoinder was not re-, ceived, and as the proof of service by mail is not in strict conformity to the rule, I think the plaintiffs must pay costs. Ordered, that the plaintiffs’ default for not surrejoining and all subsequent proceedings on the part of the defendant be set aside, and that the plaintiffs have leave to surrejoin, on payment of the costs of the default and subsequent proceedings, including seven dollars costs of opposing this motion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.