Doctor v. Kendall
Doctor v. Kendall
2 How. Pr. 239
Opinion of the Court
It appears that the fourth count was inserted in good faith, and in the belief that it was essential to the plaintiffs’ rights ; and it is not certainly clear but that the count may be necessary for the purpose of avoiding any question about the town in which the locus in quo is situate. The addition of that count can not put the defendants to much trouble or expense. Motions denied,.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.