New York Supreme Court, 1846

Van Rensselaer v. Saunders

Van Rensselaer v. Saunders
New York Supreme Court · Decided September 15, 1846 · Bbonson
2 How. Pr. 249

Counsel

S. Stevens, defendant's counsel., Davis, W. & Davis, defendant's attorneys., P. Caggeb, plaintiffs' counsel., R. Chbistie, Je., plaintiffs' attorney.

Van Rensselaer v. Saunders

Opinion of the Court

Bbonson, Chief Justice.

Without showing that the plaintiffs made profert of the indentures, there is no foundation for the motion; for oyer can only be demanded when a deed is pleaded with profert. The remedy for want of profert, where it should be made, is a demurrer. We cannot presume profert, because it may have been omitted, either improperly or upon a sufficient excuse; and it is, moreover, a general rule, that the party who moves must make out a prima facie case before his adversary is bound to answer. Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.