Rowell v. Crofoot
Rowell v. Crofoot
3 How. Pr. 15
Opinion of the Court
that to authorise the motion to be made in behalf of David Crofoot and Isaac Crofoot, Jr. only, the affidavit should have shown that a default had been obtained against Isaac Crofoot; and that if the motion was intended to be made for all the Defendants, the word “ impleaded ” should have been omitted in the title of the affidavit and notice of motion.
Motion denied with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.