New York Supreme Court, 1853

Mills v. Thursby

Mills v. Thursby
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 26, 1853 · Edwards
11 How. Pr. 121; 1853 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 9

Counsel

N. Dane Ellingwood, for defendants., Mr. Coggswell, for sheriff., Albert Mathews, for plaintiff.

Mills v. Thursby

Opinion of the Court

Edwards, Justice.

I think that the affidavit of the sheriff shows that a valid levy was made upon the personal property of the defendant before his death, and before the return day of the execution. But I am not prepared to say that there was a sufficient levy upon the real estate. It does not appear that any act whatever was done, showing that the sheriff intended to make such levy. On the contrary, I think that his affidavit shows that he did not intend to levy upon any other than the personal property. If the plaintiff insists that a valid levy can be made under an execution after the return day, I will hear a further argument upon that point. In the meantime, the motion to stay proceedings, under the levy made upon the personal property of the defendant, is denied without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.