New York Supreme Court, 1856

Moody v. Townsend

Moody v. Townsend
New York Supreme Court · Decided September 15, 1856 · Roosevelt
3 Abb. Pr. 375

Counsel

Lawton & Larned, for the appellant., Devid Dudley Field, for the respondent.

Moody v. Townsend

Opinion of the Court

Roosevelt, J.

Where a judgment is entered by confession, it is necessary that the sworn statement of indebtedness accompanying it should be sufficiently specific in sums, dates, and considerations to enable the other creditors of the debtor, with reasonable facility, to investigate its genuineness and protect themselves against fraud.

A general allegation that the judgment was “ for goods sold and delivered,” or on a note given for goods sold and delivered,” is not a compliance with requirements of the statute.

Order affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.