In re Dubois
Opinion of the Court
The application does not conform to the statute (2 R. S. 467, § 59) in the following particulars. It does not contain any statement of the books, vouchers and securities relating to the estate of the corporation. (Sub. 1.) It contains no statement of the incumbrances on the property of the corporation. (Sub. 3.) It does not state the nature of the debt or demand due the several creditors, and the true cause and consideration of such indebtedness, in each case. (Sub. 4.)
I think it should also be stated that the stock not stated to be issued to the stockholders named, is still owned by, or in the possession of the corporation; or at least, that it has not been issued.
I am also of opinion, that the inventory of the estate is not such as the statute intends. The property ought to be identified: to be so fully described as, if it be land, by metes and
As the principal office for managing the affairs and business of the company is, by the articles of association, declared to be in the city and county of New-York, (though several other places in different counties are named, where the operations of the company are to be carried on,) the notice of the order should be published, and the hearing before the referee should be had, in New-York.
The petitioners may withdraw their application for the purpose of conforming it in the particulars above stated to the statute.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.