Barker v. Barker
Opinion of the Court
The defendant is in contempt for disobeying the order of Justice Bosekrans. If he wished to avail himself of his excuse, he should have complied with the terms, and then applied for a modification. Besides, although he denies that he is worth the sum of $7,000, and avers that he is only worth, about $2,200, yet he does not deny its other allegations in plaintiff’s affidavits, that he has absconded to Canada for the purpose of abandoning plaintiff, of being beyond the reach of the process of this court, and that he has sold out his property for the same purpose, and that he declared before leaving, that such was his intention.
He comes not, therefore, with a very good grace to ask a favor of the court, and his motion must be denied. An order
Order accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.