New York Supreme Court, 1861

Devlin v. Bevins

Devlin v. Bevins
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 15, 1861 · Leonard
22 How. Pr. 290

Counsel

John H. Trapp, for plaintiff., Henry H. Morange, for defendant.

Devlin v. Bevins

Opinion of the Court

Leonard, Justice.

The motion, to strike out the reply must be granted, no counter-claim being set up by the answer.

The word “ defence” in section 154, is to be understood as meaning counter-claim.

Whether that meaning be given to section 154 or not, a reply cannot be permitted where no counter-claim is interposed by the answer, if full effect be given to section 168 of the Code.

The new matter set up in the answer, where it does not constitute a counter-claim, is to be deemed controverted by the adverse party, as upon a direct denial or avoidance, as the case may require. (Williams agt. Upton, 8 How. Pr. R., 205 ; Richtmeyer agt. Haskins, 9 How. Pr. R. 481; Myatt agt. Saratoga Mu. Ins. Co., 9 How. Pr. R., 488 ; Quin agt. Chambers, 1 Duer, 673.)

Costs of motion, $10, to the defendant, at the termination of the action.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.