Corning v. Glenville Woollen Co.
Corning v. Glenville Woollen Co.
14 Abb. Pr. 339
Opinion of the Court
If the plaintiff Isham obtained a valid prior lien upon any of the property which Corning seeks to reach by his proceedings supplementary to execution, such lien cannot be devested by these proceedings supplementary to execution, and I do not know of any practice which would justify this motion, or which will require Corning in his proceedings supplementary to execution to make Isham a party, or to serve him with notice of his proceedings.
This motion must be denied, with $10 costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.