New York Supreme Court, 1862

Chauncey v. Lawrence

Chauncey v. Lawrence
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1862 · Clerke
15 Abb. Pr. 106

Counsel

Platt, Gerard & Buckley, for the appellant., Samuel E. Cowdrey, for the respondent.

Chauncey v. Lawrence

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.*—Clerke, J.

It is certainly a question admitting inquiry, whether section 84 in the article of the Revised Statutes, relative to the powers and proceedings of the court upon bills of foreclosure (2 Rev. Stat., 191, § 154), remains in force. The editors of the fifth edition manifestly were of opinion that this section is no longer in existence; and although it may be possible, and even probable, that they err in this supposition, several sections in the Code seem to make such a supposition plausible. At all events, it admits of a question, and demands inquiry. This being the case, a demurrer based on such a supposition cannot be deemed palpably frivolous. The order should be reversed.

Order reversed, with $10 costs.†

Present, Ingraham, P. J., Barnard and Clerke, JJ.

The demurrer was subsequently sustained at special term.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.