New York Supreme Court, 1864

Hunt v. Connor

Hunt v. Connor
New York Supreme Court · Decided March 15, 1864 · Clerke
17 Abb. Pr. 466

Counsel

Robert A. Adams, for the appellant., ■Jesse C. Smith, for the respondent.

Hunt v. Connor

Opinion of the Court

Clerke, J.

I think the provisions of the Revised Statutes, as to costs against executors and administrators, referred to in section.317 of the Code, apply only to the general costs of the action, and have no reference to appeal or interlocutory costs. The statute relating to costs in error or appeal is general,— that the successful party shall recover costs, without any exception in favor of executors or administrators; and, as Justice *467Bronson says in Judah a. Stagg (22 Wend., 641), “We are not authorized to make an exception which the Legislature has not thought proper to make.”

The respective orders of the general term, in the case before us, provide that costs should abide the event, and the amount and items adjusted appear to be correct.

The order should be affirmed, without costs, however.

Leonard and Sutherland, JJ., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.