New York Supreme Court, 1868

Wright v. Rowland

Wright v. Rowland
New York Supreme Court · Decided June 15, 1868
36 How. Pr. 115

Counsel

Alfred Roe, for defendant, appellant., Chambers & Pomeroy, for plaintiff, respondent.

Wright v. Rowland

Opinion of the Court

The court

reversed the order appealed from, and discharged the attachment on defendant paying the amount of the judgment within five days—saying, that “judgment,” as defined in the sections of the Code relating to provisional remedies, meant “ a final determination of the rights of the parties to the action,” and that the pendency of the appeal from the judgment did not affect the rights of the defendant to have the attachment discharged. No written opinion was given.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.