New York Supreme Court, 1869

Nelson v. Blanchfield

Nelson v. Blanchfield
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 1, 1869 · Clerke
54 Barb. 630; 1869 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 66

Counsel

Horace Graves, for the appellant., Sullivan & Bracken, for the respondent.

Nelson v. Blanchfield

Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Clerke, P. J.

As to the facts upon which the order of arrest.was based, and which constitute the gist of the action, we would, in ordinary eases, allow the *636former to stand and' abide the trial of the issues. Their truth or falsity, in an action of tort, should never be decided on a motion. But, in this case, after the perpetration of the alleged frauds, there was a settlement between •the parties; the plaintiff accepting the defendant’s note for $700, 100 shares of Combination Silver stock, and a due-bill for 200 shares of that stock. This was a waiver of his right to arrest the defendant, and a condonation of the tort.

[New York General Term, November 1, 1869.

The order should be reversed, with costs.

Clerke, Sutherland and Cardozo, Justices.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.