New York Supreme Court, 1870

Van Slyke v. Hyatt

Van Slyke v. Hyatt
New York Supreme Court · Decided September 15, 1870 · Ingraham, Orally
9 Abb. Pr. 58

Counsel

Charles Cheney, and Joseph M. Dixon, for the appellant., Ambrose Monell, for the respondent.

Van Slyke v. Hyatt

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.* Ingraham, P. J. (orally).

We do not think that the motion made in this case was the proper one. It is not the proper practice to set aside the report of a referee at chambers upon such a ground as this. The plaintiff should have moved to have the referee make a further report. There is no irregularity in this report, and the order denying a motion to set it aside for an irregularity, was proper.

If farther or more specific findings are necessary in such a case, the motion should be to send the case back to the referee for a further finding.

The order appealed from was right; and must be affirmed with costs.

Present, Ingraham, P. J. and Cardozo, J. In this case George G. Barnard, J., having made the order appealed from, did not sit.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.