New York Supreme Court, 1872

Schmidt v. Levy

New York Supreme Court · Decided January 1, 1872 · Cardozo

61 Barb. 496; 1872 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46

Counsel

Elias G. Levy, for the appellant., Jacob A. Gross, for the respondent.

Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Cardozo, J.

A motion- for a stay of proceedings is addressed to the favor of the court; Judge Ingraham, below, allowed a stay, upon terms which he *497approved, but which the appellant, it seems, did not choose to comply with. Being discretionary, the order is not appealable; and especially when the motion is granted upon terms. The terms never can be reviewed.

[First Department, General Term, at New York, January 1, 1872.

The appeal should be dismissed, with costs.

Cardoso and Geo. G. Barnard, Justices.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.