Stebbins v. Brown
Opinion of the Court
The report of the referee having been set aside, for irregularity, on the motion heard concurrently with this appeal, it is only necessary to dispose of the appeal from the judgment, for the purpose of clearing the records of the court. ,
There were several fatal errors in the admission and rejection of evidence, during the progress of the trial. It was not competent to meet the defendant’s evidence tending to show an express agreement that absences should be deducted from the charges for board, by proof that it is the custom of hotels not to allow such deductions. The claim of the defendant, as well as his right to the deduction, stood upon the alleged express agreement; and such agreement, if made, could neither be disposed of nor altered by the proof of custom.
The defendant was at liberty to show why the note of Coolbaugh, for charges and expenses in the proceedings against him, was taken in the defendant’s name instead of the plaintiffs. The defendant claimed the account
Ingraham, and Davis, Justices.]
There were other errors, but these are sufficient to require a new trial.
The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.