New York Supreme Court, 1874

Drew v. Rearick

Drew v. Rearick
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 15, 1874 · Gilbert
3 Thomp. & Cook 337

Counsel

O. O. Cottle, for appellant., William H. Gurney, for respondent.

Drew v. Rearick

Opinion of the Court

Gilbert, J.

The appeal in this case has brought up nothing for review. The findings of the justice constitute no basis for an appeal. A judgment must be entered hpon them before they can become the subject of review by an appellate court.

The appellant might have moved for a new trial upon a case or exceptions, pursuant to section 268 of the Code, but he has not done that; No case has been made, nor exceptions settled. Moreover, the important exceptions are to findings of fact. These can be determined only by a comparison of them with the evidence given upon the trial. That is not before us. The proceeding is wholly irregular. The appeal must, therefore, be dismissed, with costs.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.