New York Supreme Court, 1874

Johnson v. Kelly

Johnson v. Kelly
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1874 · Barnard
9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 139

Counsel

Frederick T. Glover, for the appellant., N. P. Hoxie, for the respondent.

Johnson v. Kelly

Opinion of the Court

Barnard, P. J.:

We think the complaint sets out a cause of action. The plaintiffs and the defendant are stated therein to have entered into a partnership for one year, from July 20th, 1869, in the manufacture of oil; the plaintiffs to furnish capital, and the plaintiffs to bear half the losses, and the defendant half, and to share profits in same proportion. A loss is averred, at the expiration of the partnership, of $3,376.76, and the complaint asks to recover one-half thereof of defendant, namely, $1,638.88. If the facts are true, the plaintiffs will be entitled to recover.

*142The partnership is terminated. A loss has been realized, and the defendant, in the article of agreement of copartnership, has agreed to pay one-half to plaintiffs.

If the answer admits the complaint, the plaintiffs will be entitled to recover a money verdict, as in an action at law.

If an issue should be made by the answer, calling for an accounting, an accounting would be ordered, notwithstanding a money judgment is demanded in the complaint.

The demurrer is simply to the prayer for judgment, and must be overruled.

Judgment reversed, with leave to defendant to answer in twenty days, on payment of costs.

Present—Barnard, P. J., and Talcott, J.

Judgment reversed, with leave to defendant to answer within twenty days, on payment of costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.